Kate Middleton told why they did not take children to India

On Sunday, the official tour of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge started in the cities of India. Before the trip it became clear that their kids would stay at home. Kate Middleton at the request of a simple Indian explained why 11-month-old Charlotte and 2-year-old George did not go on an exciting trip this time.

Everywhere Together

When the media reported that Keith Middleton and Prince William planned to go to India without their children, many were surprised, because the royal couple never left the heirs for long, believing that their family should be together. So, in 2014, despite a tender age, George went eight months with his parents to New Zealand and Australia. Therefore, fans believed that the couple would take with them, at least, a son.

Read also

Why without George?

Yesterday, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge visited the village of Pan Bari near the Kaziranga National Park and talked with the friendly people. During the conversation, one of the local residents asked the guest why she did not bring Prince George.

Kate made everyone smile. "Because George is very naughty," she replied, colorfully outlining the prospects for the joint trip: "He would always be worn everywhere." Also the charming duchess promised during her next visit to the Indian land to take the children.

The audience appreciated the words of Kate Middleton, presenting how she, with an imperturbable face, doing public affairs, is worn on her heels, like an angry woman, trying to catch up with a smart and agile baby.

By the way, in a recent interview the wife of Prince William admitted that the constant running around for George allows her to stay slim.