Yesterday, the publication BuzzFeed on its pages published interesting information, which says that the famous 26-year-old singer Taylor Swift is none other than a relative of the satanist Zina LaVey. True, it did not provide any evidence of this, but the conspiracy theorists took this news very seriously.
It all started with a photo
One of these days one of the Internet users published a photo of Taylor Swift and Zina LaVey on her social network page. The girls in the photos were very similar, which caused an unprecedented stir. Right after that, the user wrote the idea that this similarity is not accidental. This idea was picked up by the publication BuzzFeed assuming that Taylor is a relative of the satanist Zina, although this information is very carefully hidden, so as not to damage the reputation of the singer.
However, at this stage, the scandal only began to flare up, because the lovers of magic could not be stopped. One of the users of the network suggested that Swift is none other than the LaVey clone, while others put forward the theory of reincarnation. True, the latter assumption is not entirely appropriate, because the famous Zina is still alive.
Read also- Taylor Swift for the first time in two years was published
- The artist draws famous characters with cartoons, and you will not tear off their eyes!
- 15 celebrities, who would ideally fit the role of Princess Disney!
Taylor fans did not like this news
After the inflamed scandal for the singer began to intercede her multi-million army of fans. Among the comments on the Internet it was possible to find such: "What nonsense? How can you even write such a thing? "," Everyone who believes in conspiracy needs to be treated. How could you even imagine such a thing? "," I do not see any connection. Well, similar and what? ", Etc.
The reaction of both women to all these assumptions and guesses is not yet known, but knowing the explosive nature of Zina LaVey and Taylor Swift, we can assume that the response for the publication of BuzzFeed will be suits in the libel court if it does not provide evidence of its theory.
| | | |
